Anest. intenziv. Med. 2026;37(3):143-148 | DOI: 10.36290/aim.2026.026

Experimentální hodnocení uložení do zotavovací polohy nelékařským personálem: studie variability výkonuOriginal Article

Böhm P. ORCID...1, 2, Limpouchová N. ORCID...1, 3, Peřan D. ORCID...4, 5, 6, 7, Příhoda A. ORCID...1
1 Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic
2 Emergency Medical Service of Karlovy Vary Region, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic
3 Department of Emergency Admission and LSPP of Children, University Hospital in Motol and Homolka, Prague, Czech Republic
4 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
5 Emergency Medical Services of Zlín Region, Zlín, Czech Republic
6 Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic
7 Emergency Department, Nymburk Hospital, Nymburk, Czech Republic

Objective: This performance-variability study analyzes the variations and degree of consistency in the application of techniques used by trained non-medical personnel to place a person into the recovery position. The study primarily examines performance variability in adjusting cervical spine rotation and flexion as part of preventive measures. 

Design, material and methods: An experimental design assessed the ability of the study group to place an unconscious person into the recovery position. A total of 500 participants aged 15 years and older were recruited from health science high schools and universities. Observations focused on body maneuvers such as shoulder and knee grips, spinal rotation, and head tilt. Gyroscopic sensors and an electronic goniometer measured head and cervical spine angles, while an experienced paramedic evaluated the positioning technique.

Results: Correct shoulder and knee grips were used by 445 (89%) and 430 (86%) participants, respectively. Suboptimal grips – e.g., wrist or ankle – were observed in the rest, compromising control and stability. Spinal rotation of the patient was measured and evaluated: 170 (34%) participants showed asymmetry due to poor coordination. Study-specific exploratory ranges based on a subjective assessment of one standardized patient were derived at 20–40° (achieved by 347 participants) for head tilt and 90–110° (achieved by 309 participants) for rotation around the body axis. 



Conclusion: Considerable variability was observed in recovery-position placement, particularly in head tilt and body rotation. Further research is needed to define the optimal positioning angles and to assess the extent to which trained individuals are able to achieve them consistently in practice.

Keywords: recovery position, positioning, first aid, life-saving maneuvers, lay rescuer

Received: December 11, 2025; Revised: June 12, 2026; Accepted: July 16, 2026; Prepublished online: October 7, 2026; Published: October 14, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Böhm P, Limpouchová N, Peřan D, Příhoda A. Experimentální hodnocení uložení do zotavovací polohy nelékařským personálem: studie variability výkonu. Anest. intenziv. Med. 2026;37(3):143-148. doi: 10.36290/aim.2026.026.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Purchase PDF - 40 CZK (1.7 EUR)
    will be unlocked 14.10.2027

    References

    1. Handley JA. Recovery position. Resuscitation. 1993;26(1):93-95. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(93)90168-P. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Olasveengen MT, Semeraro F, Ristagno G, Castren M, Handley A, Kuzovlev A, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Basic Life Support. Resuscitation. 2021;161:98-114. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.009. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Truhlář A, Černá Pařízková R, Dizon J, Djakow J, Drábková J, Franěk O, et al. Doporučené postupy pro resuscitaci ERC 2021: souhrn doporučení. Anest. intenziv. med. 2021;32(Suppl. A):8-70. doi:10.36290/aim.2021.043. Go to original source...
    4. Turner S, Turner I, Chapman D, Howard P, Champion P, Hatfield J, et al. A comparative study of the 1992 and 1997 recovery positions for use in the UK. Resuscitation. 1998;39(3):153-160. doi: 10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00144-0. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Djärv T, Rogers J, Semeraro F, Brädde L, Cassan P, Cimpoesu D, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2025: First Aid. Resuscitation. 2025;215(Suppl. 1):110752. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110752. Go to original source...
    6. Zarisfi F, Pek JH, Oh HHJ, Loke JH, Lim SH. Singapore First Aid Guidelines 2021. Singapore Med J. 2021;62(8):427-432. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2021112. Go to original source...
    7. Zideman DA, Singletary ME, Borra V, Cassan P, Cimpoesu CD, De Buck E, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: First Aid. Resuscitation. 2021;161:270-290. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.013. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Wilks J, Pendergast D. Skills for life: First aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in schools. Health Educ J. 2017;76(8). doi: 10.1177/0017896917728096. Go to original source...
    9. Fulstow R, Smith GB. The new recovery position, a cautionary tale. Resuscitation. 1993;26(1):89-91. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(93)90167-O. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Douma JM, Handley JA, Mackenzie E, Raitt J, Orkin A, Berry D, et al. The recovery position for maintenance of adequate ventilation and the prevention of cardiac arrest: A systematic review. Resuscitation Plus. 2022;10:100236. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100236. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Rathgeber J, Panzer W, Günther U, Scholz M, Hoeft A, Bahr J, et al. Influence of different types of recovery positions on perfusion indices of the forearm. Resuscitation. 1996;32(1):13-17. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(96)00952-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Navarro-Patón R, Freire-Tellado M, Fernández-González N, Basanta-Camiño S, Mateos-Lorenzo J, Lago-Ballesteros J. What is the best position to place and re-evaluate an unconscious but normally breathing victim? A randomised controlled human simulation trial on children. Resuscitation. 2019;134:104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.030. Go to original source...
    13. Uzun DD, Klein R, Rittmann A, Häske D, Schneider ERN, Kreinest M. Analysis of spine motion during prehospital extrication procedures in motorsport. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024;50(6):2905-2914. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02608-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. De Buck E, Van Remoortel H, Dieltjens T, Verstraeten H, Clarysse M, Moens O, et al. Evidence-based educational pathway for the integration of first aid training in school curricula. Resuscitation. 2015;94:8-22. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.06.008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Cascio CJ, Moore D, McGlone F. Social touch and human development. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019;35:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.009. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Futterman J, Bi C, Crow B, Kureshi S, Okah E. Medical educators' perceptions of race in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05232-5. Go to original source...
    17. Schirmer A, Ng T, Ebstein PR. Vicarious social touch biases gazing at faces and facial emotions. Emotion. 2018;18(8):1097-1105. doi: 10.1037/emo0000393. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Perman MS, Shelton KS, Knoepke C, Rappaport K, Matlock DD, Adelgais K, et al. Public Perceptions on Why Women Receive Less Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Than Men in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Circulation. 2019;139(8):1060-1068. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037692. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Singletary ME, Zideman AD, Bendall CJ, Berry AD, Borra V, Carlson NJ, et al. International Consensus on First Aid Science With Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation. 2020;156:A240-A282. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.016. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Veselá K, Franěk O. 35 No gender differences found in bystander CPR in Prague. BMJ Open. 2018;8(Suppl. 1). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-EMS.35. Go to original source...
    21. Peřan D, Veselá K, Franěk O. Letter by Peran et al Regarding Article, "Public Perceptions on Why Women Receive Less Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Than Men in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest." Circulation. 2019;140(9):e510. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040792. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    Return to the content


    Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína

    Madam, Sir,
    please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
    Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

    I declare:

    1. that I have met the above instruction
    2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited

    No
    Yes

    If your statement is not true, please be aware
    that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.